The industrial minerals and their employment in the agricultureeolite
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work had as objective to evaluate different magnesita dose, agricultural lime, dolomita, calcareous fosfatada, fosforita, zeolita and the employment of the plaster and in different floors and cultivations. For to locate the floors information was used from the digital maps to 1:25000 and its chemical characterization. During the years 2018 -2019 behaved at home of glass 4 experiments in which gavels of 1,6 kg of capacity like experimental unit were used, using a totally randomized design, 5 sizes of zeolita particle were evaluated (<0,25 mm, 0,25-0,50, 0,50-1,00, 1,00.-2,00 and 2.00-3,00) and 5 dose (0.00, 1.88, 4.74, 6.88 and 9.38 g floor kg-1). Each treatment had four replicas and it was used like indicative plant the Rhodes (Chlorys gallane c.v Pioner) .Para the rest of the conditioners statistical designs of block were used at random with 4 treatments and 4 repetitions (0, 1, 2,3 t/ha agricultural lime and Dolomita), and (0, 60,120,160gr/planta of magnesita), the doses of calcareous fosfatada corresponded to (0,7,1.4 and 2.1 t/ha),el plaster were evaluated using calculation formulas. The considered floors were Ferríticos, Aliticos, Brown grizzly, Brown with carbonates and Húmicos sialiticos to be the most representative and with agricultural vocation in Cuba. The dose of 180 magnesita/árbol grs in the toronja,2t/ha of Dolomita in orange and 0.7 t/ha of calcareous fosfatada in tomato and 2,5 t/ha of agricultural lime in the tobacco was the best variants, he/she was proven the direct application of the fosforita in sour floors and the alternative of the employment of the plaster in sodium floors of Guantánamo, in the case of the zeolita the particle sizes between 1,00 and 3,00 mm obtained the best results when improving the chemical conditions of the floors and to reduce until in 57% the volatilización of the nitrogen. The biggest doses of zeolita application were able to increase the content of interchangeable bases in the floor as well as the yield of dry mass and the concentration to foliate of nutritious of the indicative plant.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the magazine the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons 4.0 Recognition-NonCommercial Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever it is indicate its author and its first publication this magazine. Under this license the author will be free from:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform and create from the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms while complying with the terms of the license
Under the following conditions:
- Recognition - You must properly recognize the authorship, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made. You can do it in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you have the support of the licensor or receive it for the use you make.
- NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose.
- There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
The magazine is not responsible for the opinions and concepts issued in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. The mention of trademarks of specific equipment, instruments or materials is due to identification purposes, there being no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
References
Arangón, C. 1983. Enmiendas de suelos salinos-sódicos del área de placetas a nivel de laboratorio y análisis preliminar en Guatemala. Tesis Lic. Científica universidad de Agronomía en San Carlos de Guatemala, 104 pp.
Aziz, M.A. 1999. Effect of different reclamation process on some chemical properties of saline alkal, Soil annals of Agr. Se. 36 (1): 295 - 305.
Beatriz, A. & Duggan, E. 2004. Comparative evaluation of sur face concentrated versus internally incorpored calciumclhroride and gysum in alkali Soil. Soil Sei. 146 (4): 277-283.
Berenguer, T. 1996.Ventajas de la utilización del yeso agrícola. Revista Voces / agricultura Edit. Fertilizantes, Argentina: 18-19.
Borroto, M. Stosharov, V Deli, I, Villavicencio R & Alasá D. 1984. Esquema preliminar de suelo salino. La Habana, Instituto de Investigaciones de Suelos y Agroquímica, Ministerio de la Agricultura pp. 10-15.
Borroto, M; I, Villavicencio & Alasa, D. 1980. Informe final resultado 004-1432, Cuba: Instituto de Suelos, 88 p.
Casanova, E. 2005. Fertilizantes y enmiendas de origen Mineral en Venezuela. Jornada Técnica sobre los minerales y el uso en la agricultura, Cetem (1): 17-23.
Casanova, E. & Toro M. 2002. The use nuclear abed relates techniques for evaluating the agronomy effectiveness of phosphate fertilizer in particular, rock phosphate in Venezuela. Ed IAEA-TECDOC 1272: 93-100.
Colombani, N., Mastrocicco, M., Di Giuseppe, D. Faccini, B. & Coltorti, M. 2015. Batch and column experiments on nutrient leaching in soils amended with Italian natural zeolitites. Catena, 127: 64 - 71.
Colombani, N., Mastrocicco, M., Di Giuseppe, D. Faccini, B. & Coltorti, M. 2014. Variation of the hydraulic properties and solute transportmechanisms in a silty-clay soil amended with natural zeolites. Catena, 123: 195 - 204.
Costafreda, J.L. 2014. Tectosilicatos con características especiales: las zeolitas naturales. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Minas y Energía. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Editorial Fundación Gómez Pardo: Madrid. 26p. Available:< oa.upm.es/32548/1/Tectosilicatos_Costafreda.pdf>, [Consulted: May 6, 2023]
ECURED: Directivas del plan de desarrollo de la Isla de la Juventud hasta el año 2020. Available: < http./www.ecured.cu/index.php/slc juventud >, [Consulted: May 10, 2023]
EMBRAPA. 2023. Available: < http://www.Cobreg.cupm.embrapa.br/resueta/Brasil/legbr.htm;2003 [Consulted: May 10, 2023]
EspecieS.C., Baptista, M., Gómes, P.S., Polidoro, J.C., Lopes, S., Silva, M., Vargas, H., Mota, L. & Gomes, L. 2015. Cuban zeolite as ammonium carrier in urea-based fertilizer pellets: Photoacoustic-based sensor for monitoring N-ammonia losses byvolatilization in aqueous solutions. Sensors and actuators B: Chemical 212: 35 - 40.
Etchevenny, R. 2000. Depósitos de yeso, en recursos minerales de la República Argentina. IGRM, SEGEMAN, Anexos 35: 1091-1093, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernández, L.C., Rojas, N.G., Roldán, T.G., Ramírez, M.E., Zegarra, H.G., Uribe, R., Reyes, R.J., Flores, D. & Arce, J.M. 2006. Manual de técnicas de análisis de suelos aplicadas a la remediación de sitios contaminados. México D.F.: Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales e Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Editorial del Deporte Mexicano,182p.
Flórez Macías, A., Galvis, A. Hernández, T.M., De León, F. & Payán, F. 2007. Efecto de la adición de zeolita /Clinoptilolita y modernita) en un andosol sobre el ambiente químico edáfico y el crecimiento de la avena. Rev. Ciencia Tecn. América, 32(10): 692 - 696.
Forber, T & F Ortega. 1985. Aumento de la salinidad y empantanamiento en la zona oriental del valle de Guantánamo vinculado con el incremento del riego. III Jornada Científica, La Habana: Instituto de suelos, pp. 357-362.
Fuente, C., Salazar A. & Obregón, P. 2000 Rocas y Minerales industriales en el Salvador. CITED IBeroamerica, pp.66.
Gholamhoseini, M., Ghalavand, A., Khodaei-Joghan, A., Dolatabadian, A., Zakikhani, H. & Farmanbar, E. 2013. Zeolite-amended cattle manure effects on sunflower yield, seed quality, water use efficiency and nutrient leaching. Soil Tillage Res, 126:193-202.
Gambando, S: Minerales para la sostenibilidad de los sistemas agropecuarios. Http/ www: planeta Soja. Como primer trabajo 800, Argentina 2006.
Gobran, G, R & S. Miyamoto. 1985. Dissolution rate of gypsum in agueous salt solutions. Soil. Sei 140 (2): 89-95.
Godínez, J. 2003. Los fertilizantes y enmiendas de origen mineral edic. Panorama Minero,283 pp.
Gupta & Singh.1986. Al evacuar la efectividad del yeso y del cloruro de calcio, usados solos o combinados, encontraron que ambos influyeron sobre el pH, sodicidad, conductiva eléctrica y en la permeabilidad, destacándose la mayor efectividad del yeso en los cambios del PSI.
Gupta, R & P. Abrol. 1990. Salt affected soils their reclamation and management for crop production. Adv soil Sci 11:223-288.
Harris, P. 2001. A field day for minerals. Industrial Minerals, 25 p.
Hernández, A. 1986. Regionalización geográfica de los suelos de Guantánamo con elementos de mejoramiento para la caña de azúcar (archivo) Instituto de Suelos, 34 pp.
Iglesia, R & Olivares, A. 1993. Recuperación de un suelo salino-sódico utilizando yeso y fuentes de fosfoyeso y su incidencia sobre el desarrollo de la yuca. Tesis de grado, Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Departamento de edafología, 144 pp.
Instituto de Suelos. 2001, La Habana, Cuba.
Jha, V. K.; Hayashi, S. & Hazard, J. 2009. Modification on natural clinoptilolite zeolite for its NH4 + retention capacity. Mater. 169 (1-3): 29 - 35.
Juventud Rebelde. 2010. Diversificar la agricultura es propósito clave en la Isla de la Juventud. Available: < http. /www juventud rebelde.cu/Cuba/2010 >, [Consulted: Febuuary 10, 2023]
Khosla, B, K & P. Abrol. 1972. Effect of gypsum finenss on the composition of saturation extract of saline sodic. Soil. Sei, 113 (3): 204-206.
Kolyagin, Yu, S. & O. A. Karasev. 1999. Root nutrition and the quality of sugar beet. Bulgaria. Sakharnaya Svekla, 6:11-12.
Korda, V.1980. Land aridization and drought control westriew special studies in natural resource and energy management. westriew Press.inc.Boulder, Colorado.
Lamoru, G. 1980.Formación de Suelos. Conferencia impartida en la primera Reunión Nacional de Suelos Salinos. Cuba. P. 13-18.
Lara C. & W.A.R. 1980. Trivelin, P.C.O. 1997. Eficiencia de un colector semi-abierto estático no cuantificado de N-NH3volatilizado da urea aplicado a un suelo. Revista brasileira de ciencia do solo 14:481-487.
Llerena, F. H., Becerra A. &Velázquez. 1988. Recuperación extensiva de suelos altamente salinos - sódico del lago de Texcoco, Terra, 4(2):173-179.
López, M.; Hernández, M.; Barahona, C.; Martínez, M.; Portillo, R. & Rojas, F. 2010. Propiedades fisicoquímicas de la clinoptilolita tratada con fertilizantes a usar como aditivo en el cultivo de Pleurotus ostreatus. Terra Latinoamericana, 28: 1-8.
Malekian, R, Koupai, A & Eslamian. Y. 2011. Influences of clinoptilote and factant-modified clinoptilolite zeolite on nitrate leaching and plant growth. JH. Mater, 185: 970-976.
Martínez, G & Walthhall, P. 2000. Terra, 18 (3) 187-197.
Mengel, K. & Kirby, E. 2000. Principios de nutrientes vegetal, 4nd ed., Suiza: Instituto Internacional de Potasa, Basilea 607 p.
Millán, G., Agosto, F., Vásquez, L., Botto, L., Lombardi, L. & Juan, L. 2008. Uso de clinoptilonita como un vehículo de fertilizantes nitrogenados en un suelo de la región Pampeana de Argentina. Cien. Inv. Agr. 35(3): 293-302.
Mogollón, P. 2002. Aplicación de yeso en la agricultura. Instituto de Tecnología Minera. Venezuela. Revista SEGEMAR: 68-72.
Morejón, L. Pozo, C & Gandarilla, J. 1995. Informe del resultado 01305004-02 (inédito). Cuba: Instituto de Suelos.
Pozo, C & Vallin, G. 1994. Informe del resultado 01305004-03 (inédito). Cuba: Instituto de Suelos.
Nadlen, A & N. Margaritz. 1986. Long - tern effect of extensive gypsum adment on soil proprieties and soil solution chemical composition Soil. Sei, 142 (2): 192-202
Niborski, M. 2000. El exceso de sales de sodio en los suelos de las regiones áridas y semiaridas. Cátedra de Manejo y conservación de Suelos. Facultad de agronomía de la universidad de Buenos Aires 19pp.
Instituto de Suelos de Cuba.1996. NRAG 879.88. Norma Ramal de Análisis Químicos de Suelo, Cuba.
Instituto de Suelos de Cuba. 2010. NRAG/CNTN-O5. Norma Ramal de análisis foliares, Cuba.
Organización Veracruzana de la Toronja. 2015. Agrotécnia de la Toronja. Available: < http.//www.org./agricultural frutales, toronja/html >, [Consulted: February 12, 2023]
Ortega, S., Forbes, T & Lamoru, G. 1983. El avance de la senilidad en el Valle de Guantánamo área de la empresa cañera Paraguay. Informe interno. Cuba: Instituto de suelos, A.C. 11 p.
Pérez, J., Cabrera, R & García, J. 1990. Determinación de parámetros para el lavado de suelos salinizados del valle de Guantánamo. Inf. Parcial. Cuba: ECICARA, MINAZ. INICA, 48p.
Pizarro, F.1985. Drenaje agrícola y Recuperación de Suelos Salinos. Madrid. Agrícola Española, 542 p.
Pizarro, F. 1985.Drenaje agrícola y recuperación de Suelos Sódicos, Madrid. Agrícola Española 155 p.
Ponce, M & Torres Duggan. 2006. Yeso en Minerales para la agricultura. Argentina, Univ. Nac. De San Martín: Latinoamérica Ed. Nelson, H CytEA, 12T, 188 p.
Prather, R. J. 1978. Efficient amendment use sodic soil reclamation. Soil Sei. Soc. Am. J., 42 (5) 782 - 786.
Proaño, G & Jarrin, J. 2000. Rocas y Minerales industriales. Iberoamérica, CITED, 72p.
Rajan, S, Brown, M, Boyes, M & Upsdel. 1996. Extractable phosphorus to predict agronomic effectiveness of ground and urground phosphate rocks fert. Res., 32: 291-302
Sagar, S. 2013. Monografía Toronja. Veracruz: México Available: < http. www.Stacon.Sagarpa gob.mx html>, [Consulted: February 12, 2023]
Soca M., Castellanos J. & Febles J. 2004. Efecto de la zeolita en la eficiencia de los fertilizantes químicos, fertilizantes y enmiendas de origen mineral. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Panorama Minero 14:261-268.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization and international Fertilizer Development Center (IF DC). 1998. Fertilizer manual. 615 pp.
Zaman, M. & Nguyen, M.L. 2010. Effect of lime or zeolite on N2O and N2 emissions from a pastoral soil treated with urine or nitrate-N fertilizer under field conditions. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment 136: 254 - 261.
Zwingmann, N., Singh, B., Mackinnon, I. & Gilkes, R. 2009. Zeolite from alkali modified kaolin increases. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba: Conferencia sobre Suelos Salinos en Guantánamo pp. 3-9. 1978, Cuba.